Dizin Eklenmedi

Participation and Satisfaction as Drivers for Human Action: M-Internet and Community Life

Received: 2014-06-22 Accepted: 2015-06-21 Published: 2015-06-27



Any technology adoption is shaped by a myriad of factors that sometimes conflict in their goals and outcomes. So is the case with mobile internet (m-internet) adoption. This paper discusses the role participation and satisfaction play in the m-internet adoption process. Within a theoretical framework that articulates Maslow’s hierarchy of needs theory and the uses and gratification theory (U&G) and other theoretical models of adoption and acceptance of innovations, this paper explores the connection between participation in online communities, which implies both social interaction and content production, and the satisfaction of users’ needs. Several technology adoption models identify participation and satisfaction as key drivers for adoption, but few discuss how different players in the process depict these variables and these differences might sometimes result in rejection.
Our research presents results for the use of m-internet in a southern European country – Portugal – and identifies participation and satisfaction as variables that are predictors of adoption and help in explaining varied use patterns between m-internet and fixed internet and changes in the adoption process.


Keywords: Participation; satisfaction; m-internet; mediated communication; social interaction; technology adoption

Please purchase to download content


Please purchase to download PDF




Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M., (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Barley, S. (1990). The Alignment of Technology and Structure Through Roles and Networks. Administrative Science Quarterly (35:1), pp. 61-103.
Berman, S. & Kesterson-Townes, L. (2011). Beyond Internet: Connecting media and entertainment to the future. EUA: IBM Institute for Business Value.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In Richardson J. (ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. New York: Grennwood press.
Carpentier, N. (2011). Media and participation: a site of ideological-democratic struggle. London: Intellect.
Davis, F.(1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly (13:3), pp. 319-339.
Deuze, M (2008). Corporate Appropriation of Participatory Culture.In Carpentier, N & de Cleen, B, (ED.), Participation and Media Production: Critical Reflections on Content Creation, Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp, 27-41
Dutta-Bergamn, M. (2005). Access to the internet in the context of community participation and community satisfaction. New Media & Society, 7 (1), p82-109. London: Sage.
Gerpott, T. (2010). Communication behaviors and perceptions of mobile internet adopters, Info, Emerald, Vol. 12 Iss: 4, pp.54 – 73.
Haddon, L. & Green, N. (2010). Mobile Communications: An introduction to new media. Oxford: Berg.
Hampton, K, Lee, C & Her, E (2011). How New Media Affords Network Diversity: Direct and Mediated Access to Social Capital Through Participation in Local Social Settings. New Media & Society 13(7), 1031-1049. 2011
Hong, S & Tam, K (2006). Understanding the Adoption of Multipurpose Information Appliances: The Case of Mobile Data Services, Journal of Information Systems Research, 17: 16-179
Katz, E., Haas, H., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). On the Use of the Mass Media for Important Things. American Sociological Review, vol. 38(2), pp. 164-181.
Katz, J. & Aakhus, M. (eds.) (2002). Perpetual Contact, Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lasswell, H. (1948). The Structure and Function of Communications in Society. The Communication of Ideas, pp. 37-51.
Lejnieks, A. (2011). Generation Unplugged. Research Report, Harris Interactive, September 12, 2008, http://files.ctia.org/pdf/HI_TeenMobileStudy_ResearchReport.pdf, accessed on July 21, 2011
Ling, R. (2008). New Tech, New Ties: How mobile communication is reshaping social cohesion. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Ling, R. & Donner, J. (2009). Mobile Phones and Mobile Communication. London: Polity Press.
Ling, R. & Yttri, B. (2002). Hyper-coordination via Mobile Phones in Norway. Katz, J. and Aakhus, M. (eds.). Perpetual Contact, Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 139-169.
López-Nicolás, C, Molina-Castillo, F & Bouwman, H (2008). An assessment of advanced mobile services acceptance: Contributions from TAM and diffusion theory models. Information & Management, Volume 45, Issue 6, September 2008
Marôco, J. (2007). Análise estatística com SPSS. Edições Sílabo, Lisboa.
Maslow, A. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, vol. 50, pp. 370-396.
Maslow, A. (1970). Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper and Row (2nd ed.).
McQuail, D., Blumler, J. G., & Brown, J. (1972). The Television Audience: A revised perspective. Sociology of Mass Communication. Middlesex, England: Penguin, pp. 135–165.
Norman, D. (1999). Affordances, Conventions and Design. Interactions, 6 (3), pp. 38-43.
Park, N., Kerk, F. K. & Valenzuela, S. (2009). Being Immersed in Social Networking Environment: Facebook Groups, Uses and Gratifications, and Social Outcomes. CyberPsychology & Behavior, vol. 12 (6), pp. 729-33.
Plant, S. (2001). On the Mobile: The Effects of Mobile Telephones on Social and Individual Life, Motorola. Retrieved from http://www.motorola.com/mot/doc/0/234_MotDoc.pdf
Quico, C.; Damásio, M.; Henriques, S. & Veríssimo, I. (2011). Drivers and barriers to digital television adoption in Portugal: the perspectives of the TV viewers and other main stakeholders. In Proc. of IAMCR 2011. Kadir Has University, Istambul  13 - 17  Julho 2011.
Rogers, E. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. Glencoe: Free Press.
Ruggiero, T. (2000). Uses and Gratifications Theories in the 21st Century. Mass Communication and Society, vol. 3 (1), pp. 3-37.
Saber, M. & Souiden, N. (2010). Rethinking the TAM model: time to consider fun. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 27 (4), 336-344.
Silverstone, R. & Haddon, L. (1996). Design and the Domestication of Information and Communication Technologies: technical change and everyday life. MARSHELL, R. and SILVERSTONE, R. (eds.). Communication Design: The politics of Information and Communication Technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 44-74.
Smith, A. (2010). Mobile Access 2011. Pew Internet & American Life Project, July 7, 2010, http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Mobile-Access-2010.aspx, accessed on July 21, 2011.
The World Internet Project (2012). USC Center for the Digital Future Releases Third Report of the World Internet Project. USC-Annenberg. School for Communication and Journalism.
Valenzuela, S. Park & N. Kee, K. (2009). Is There social capital in social network site? Facebook and college students life satisfaction, trust and participation. Journal of computer mediated communication, 14, 875-901
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G. & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27 (3), 425-478.
Vincent, J. (2003). Social shaping of UMTS preparing the 3G customer, UMTS Forum Report 26
Wang, H. & Wang, S. (2010). User acceptance of mobile internet based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: investigating the determinants and gender differences. Social Behavior and Personality, 38 (3), 414-426.
Wellman, B. & Gulia, M. (2002). Virtual communities as communities. In Smith M. & Kollock P. Communities in Cyberspace. London: Kindle Edition, pp.167-194
West, R. L. & Lynn H. T. (2010). Uses and Gratifications Theory. Introducing Communication Theory: Analysis and Application. Boston: McGraw-Hill, pp. 392-409.
Wu, J. & Wang, S. (2005). What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model, Journal Information and Management, Volume 42 Issue 5, July 2005, Pages 719 - 729
Zickuh, K. & Smith, A. (2011). 28% of American adults use mobile and social locationbased services. Pew Internet & American Life Project http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Location.aspx, accessed on July 21, 2011..

Citation Information

Cited by articles

Cited by Google Scholar

Search GoogleScholar

Citation Management Tool

Altmetric Attention Score

Full Text Views

Cited by

Ethical Obligations Journal Sevices Contact us
Copyright © 2010-2017 MacroWorld Ltd. All Rights Reserved