Dizin Eklenmedi

How Twitter Connects to the Information Sources Network over Time in the Occupy Wall Street Social Movement

Received: 2015-11-05 Accepted: 2015-11-29 Published: 2016-01-20
DOI:10.15340/2147336622992Pages:11-121

Abstract


 

This paper examines the formation and evolution of the Twitter hyperlink network that occurred in the Occupy Wall Street (OWS) social movement. It tests information source genre, nodal popularity and centrality as three explanatory logics predicting the likelihood of tie formation in the information sourcing network of OWS. Analysis of the Twitter hyperlink network identified a group of information sources that are central to the movement discussion on Twitter. The results show that social networking sites and peer-content production sites were more likely to gain connections over time than other information genres, and sources that were initially central in the network tended to maintain their position and increase their connectivity.

Keywords: Twitter sourcing network, OWS social movement, intermedia agenda setting, resource mobilization, network connectivity logics

Please purchase to download content


€4

Please purchase to download PDF


€4

References


 

Andrews, K. T., & Caren, N. (2010). Making the news: Movement organizations, media attention, and the
 
public agenda. American Sociological Review, 75, 841–866. doi: 10.1177/0003122410386689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0003122410386689
 
Atkinson, J. D. (2008). Towards a model of interactivity in alternative media: A multilevel analysis of
 
audiences and producers in a new social movement network. Mass Communication and Society, 11,
 
227-247. doi: 10.1080/15205430801919705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15205430801919705
 
Atton, C. (2002). Alternative media. London: Sage Publications.
 
Atton, C. (2003). Reshaping social movement for a new millennium. Social Movement Studies, 2(1), 3-15.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1474283032000062530
 
doi: 10.1080/1474283032000062530.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1474283032000062530
 
Bajpai, K., & Jaiswal, A. (2011). A framework for analyzing collective action events on Twitter. Proceedings
 
of the 8th International ISCRAM Conference, Lisbon, Portugal.
 
Barabási, A. L. & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286, 509-512. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.509
 
10.1126/science.286.5439.509
 
boyd, danah, & Crawford, K. (2011). Six provocations for big data: A decade in Internet time: Symposium
 
on the Dynamics of the Internet and Society, Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1926431 or
 
http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1926431.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1926431
 
Boyle, M P., McCluskey, M.R., Deyanathan, N., Stein, S.E. & McLeod, D. (2004). The influence of level
 
of deviance and protest type on coverage of social protest in Wisconsin from 1960 to 1999. Mass
 
Communication & Society, 7, 43-60. doi: 10.1207/s15327825mcs0701_4
http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327825mcs0701_4
 
Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age. Cambridge, UK:
 
Polity Press.
 
Della Porta, D., & Mosca, L. (2005). Global-net for global movements? A network of networks for a
 
movement of movements. Journal of Public Policy, 25, 165-190. doi:10.1017/S0143814X05000255.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X05000255
 
De Maeyer, J. (2013). Towards a hyperlinked society: A critical review of link studies. New Media & Society,
 
15(5), 737-751. doi: 10.1177/1461444812462851.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444812462851
 
Downing, J. D. H. (2008). Social movement theories and alternative media: An evaluation and critique.
 
Communication, Culture & Critique, 1, 40–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-9137.2007.00005.x
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-9137.2007.00005.x
 
Eltantawy, N., & Wiest, J. B. (2011). Social media in the Egyptian revolution: Reconsidering resource
 
mobilization theory. International Journal of Communication, 5, 1207-1224.
 
Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the new left.
 
Berkeley: University of California Press.
 
Halavais, A. (2008). The hyperlink as organizing principle. In J. Turow., & L. Tsui (Eds.). The hyperlinked
 
society (pp. 39–55). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
 
Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., & Tseng, B. (2007). Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and
 
communities. Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and
 
social network analysis, WebKDD/SNA-KDD'07 (pp. 56–65). New York, USA: ACM.
 
Jenkins, J. C. (1983). Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements. Annual Review of
 
Sociology, 9, 527-553. doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.09.080183.002523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.09.080183.002523
 
Kim, E-G., & Hamilton, J. W. (2006). Capitulation to capital? OhmyNews as alternative media. Media,
 
Culture & Society, 28, 541-560. doi: 10.1177/0163443706065028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0163443706065028
 
Kleinberg, J. M. (1999). Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM, 46, 604-
http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/324133.324140
 
632. doi:10.1145/324133.324140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/324133.324140
 
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
 
Kropczynski, J., & Nah, S. (2011). Virtually networked housing movement: Hyperlink network
 
structure of housing social movement organizations. New Media Society, 13, 689-703.
 
doi:10.1177/1461444810372786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444810372786
 
Lee, B., Lancendorfer, K. M., & Lee, K. J. (2005). Agenda-setting and the Internet: The intermedia influence
 
of internet bulletin boards on newspaper coverage of the 2000 general election in South Korea. Asian
 
Journal of Communication, 15, 57–71. doi: 10.1080/0129298042000329793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0129298042000329793
 
Lenhard, A., & Fox, S. (2009). Twitter and status updating. Pew Internet and American Life Project.
 
Retrieved at http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/Twitter-and-status-update.aspx.
 
Lopez-Escobar, E., Llamas, J. P., McCombs, M., & Lennon, F. R. (1998). Two levels of agenda setting among
 
advertising and news in the 1995 Spanish elections. Political Communication, 15, 225–238. doi:
 
10.1080/10584609809342367
 
Lotan, M., Graeff, E., Ananny, M., Gaffney, D., Pearce, I., & Boyd. D. (2011). The revolutions were tweeted:
 
Information flows during the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions. International Journal of
 
Communications, 5, 1375-1405.
 
McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory.
 
American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212-1241. doi:10.2307/2777934
 
McCombs, M. E. (2004). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Cambridge, UK: Polity
 
Press.
 
Messner, M., & DiStaso, M. W. (2008). The source cycle: How traditional media and weblogs use each
 
other as sources. Journalism, 9, 447-463. doi: 10.1080/14616700801999287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616700801999287
 
Meraz, S. (2009). Is there an elite hold? Traditional media to social media agenda setting influence in
 
blog networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 682–707. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-
 
6101.2009.01458.x
 
Meraz, S. (2011). Using time series analysis to measure intermedia agenda-setting influence in traditional
 
media and political blog networks. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88, 176-194.
 
doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01458.x
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01458.x
 
Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. (2009). Public remains focus on economic conditions:
 
Wall Street protests receive limited attention. Retrieved at http://www.people-press.org/files/legacypdf/
 
10-12-11%20NII%20Final.pdf
 
Ripley, R. M., Snijders, T. A. B., & Preciado, P. (2012). Manual for Rsiena. Retrieved December 1, 2012, from
 
http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~snijders/siena/RSiena_Manual.pdf
 
Rogers, R. (2010) Mapping public web space with the IssueCrawler. In B. Reber., & C. Brossard (Eds.).
 
Digital cognitive technologies: Epistemology and the knowledge economy (pp. 115-126). London/
 
Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
 
Rogers, R., & Marres, N. (2000). Landscaping climate change: A mapping technique for understanding
 
science and technology debates on the World Wide Web. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 141-163.
 
doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/9/2/304
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/2/304
 
Segerberg, A., & Bennett, W. L. (2012). Social media and the organization of collective action: Using
 
Twitter to explore the ecologies of two climate change protests. The Communication Review, 14, 197-
 
215. doi: 10.1080/10714421.2011.597250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2011.597250
 
Shen, C., & Monge, P. R. (2011). Who connects with whom? A social network analysis of an online open
 
source software community, First Monday, 16, Retrieved December 1, 2012, from http://firstmonday.
 
org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3551/2991
 
Snijders, T.A.B., van de Bunt, G.G., & Steglich, C.E.G. (2010). Introduction to actor-based models for
 
network dynamics. Social Networks, 32, 44-60. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.004.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.004
 
Thorson, K., Driscoll, K., Ekdale, B., Ederly, S., Thompson, L. G., Schrock, A., Swartz, L., Vraga, E. K., & Wells,
 
C. (2013). YouTube, Twitter and the Occupy Movement: Connecting content and circulation practices.
 
Information, Communication & Society, 16, 421-451. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.756051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.756051

Citation Information


Cited by articles

Cited by Google Scholar

Search GoogleScholar

Citation Management Tool



Altmetric Attention Score


Full Text Views

Cited by


Ethical Obligations Journal Sevices Contact us
Copyright © 2010-2017 MacroWorld Ltd. All Rights Reserved